Subject	Its an NA. Not a whole lot of tortional flexion generated.
Posted by	AshsZ (FABio) on January 03, 2003 at 8:08 AM
	This message has been viewed 57 times.
In Reply To	Ohhh, a UD Pulley recommendation???? (n/m) posted by wcoffey on January 03, 2003 at 07:38 AM
Message	Since it doesn't make really big HP, the NA engine IMO doesn't really need to worry about it. High HP TTZ's really should keep a dampener, whether it is stock or a fisher or some other, it really does need it. I figure this guy wants to go all motor with this car and at best he'll be making only ~300HP at the crankshaft. NBD when it comes to crank flex. [ ashleypowers.com ] [ agpowers@bellsouth.net ] [ Zemulator Information Sheet ] When pigs dance, you better get it on video... "You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive." -George Carlin
Follow Ups	motor rebuild - nizmo300zx 06:19:42 01/03/03 Why Ti and forged pistons on an NA engine? - AshsZ (FABio) 07:26:40 01/03/03 Ohhh, a UD Pulley recommendation???? (n/m) - wcoffey 07:38:16 01/03/03 Its an NA. Not a whole lot of tortional flexion generated. - AshsZ (FABio) 08:08:54 01/03/03 Dampner on the NA? Never thought it would need it. (n/m) - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 09:06:26 01/03/03 There is crank flexion. Here's some math >>> - AshsZ (FABio) 09:26:06 01/03/03 "carry the 2 and divide by"... head starting to hurt. Thanx (n/m) - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 09:31:53 01/03/03 You can run alot of SPRAY:) (n/m) - LRD VDR 08:52:11 01/03/03 I personally doubt porting an NA would help much.... - RSR 10:05:01 01/03/03 *shrug* 500cc cylinder. 2.0LVTEC's have same bore and - AshsZ (FABio) 10:31:20 01/03/03 Best advice ever- save your money and spend it on a TT - Marshall 13:57:22 01/03/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.